Translations:Digitization, Preservation and Ingest/162/en: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:47, 17 March 2024

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Digitization, Preservation and Ingest)

The second element of quality review is ensuring that the digitization specifications have all been met—that the digital surrogates are created in the right format and quality, with correct filenames, and selected metadata has been captured. Here again we will need to use a combination of manual and automated quality review, which is supported by software tools and applications such as "[https://jhove.openpreservation.org/ '''JHOVE'''].”

The second element of quality review is ensuring that the digitization specifications have all been met—that the digital surrogates are created in the right format and quality, with correct filenames, and selected metadata has been captured. Here again we will need to use a combination of manual and automated quality review, which is supported by software tools and applications such as "JHOVE.”

Revision as of 22:45, 25 February 2024 (view source) FuzzyBot (talk \| contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)		Latest revision as of 16:47, 17 March 2024 (view source) FuzzyBot (talk \| contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The second element of quality review is ensuring that the digitization specifications have all been met—that the digital surrogates are created in the right format and quality, with correct filenames, and selected metadata has been captured. Here again we will need to use a combination of manual and automated quality review, which is supported by software tools and applications such as "JHOVE.”		The second element of quality review is ensuring that the digitization specifications have all been met—that the digital surrogates are created in the right format and quality, with correct filenames, and selected metadata has been captured. Here again we will need to use a combination of manual and automated quality review, which is supported by software tools and applications such as "[https://jhove.openpreservation.org/ '''JHOVE'''].”